How does Chaucer's "Canterbury Tales" and Matt Groening's "The Simpsons" reflect the negative attitude of their respective society

Through hundreds of years, the society has been changing and evolving. In Chaucers Canterbury Tales and Matt Groenings The Simpsons, some(prenominal) contexts ring the negative attitude of their respective society. Both texts criticise resembling areas of humanity using methods such as satire, irony and humour. With these techniques, as well as the type of medium, it is an effective way of presenting the issues of society. Chaucer depicts apiece character satirically or sincerely, according to the characters influence on society. The corruption of the church is universe criticized by his descriptions of religious figures. For example, in one of his portraits, the monastic is supposed to lead a round-eyed flavor focused on god, but instead, he embodys lavishly. The monk was expected to eat simple things, like bread and water, on with some fruit. He was a lord ful fat and in good point implies that he is well looked after. He enjoys lookup animals: An outridere that lov ede venerye. This suggests that he does non care about his duties and rules and also his weird life is absent. The description of his clothes, with grys, and that the fyneste of a lond, suggests that he has misused the churchs currency. Also, being a monk out of his cloystre, he does not regular live in the church, and therefore does not follow the conventions of being a monk. Another portrait of a religious figure is the prioress.

She is highly considerate towards animals, and favours them over the starving community: of smale houndes hadde she that she fedde with rosted flessh, or draw and wastel-breed. Roas ted meat and white bread were considered to ! be the finest foods and it is not appropriate to feed them to her pets. This is another sign of the misuse of notes in the church. With The Simpsons i think people can distingush adjoin by a cartoon make for humor to reality. It is made to overdraw things, for humour. also...where is the conclusion? All in all, it was an ok essay. If you pauperism to let a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay